Punishment for failure to pay contributions, etc.
85. If any person--
(a) fails to pay any contribution which under this Act he is liable to pay, or
(b) deducts or attempts to deduct from the wages of an employee the whole or any part of the employer's contribution, or
(c) in contravention of section 72 reduces the wages or any privileges or benefits admissible to an employee, or
(d) in contravention of section 73 or any regulation dismisses, discharges, reduces or otherwise punishes an employee, or
(e) fails or refuses to submit any return required by the regulations, or makes a false return, or
(f) obstructs any Inspector or other official of the Corporation in the discharge of his duties, or
(g) is guilty of any contravention of or non-compliance with any of the requirements of this Act or the rules or the regulations in respect of which no special penalty is provided,
he shall be punishable--
(i) where he commits an offence under clause (a), with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years but--
(a) which shall not be less than one year, in case of failure to pay the employee's contribution which has been deducted by him from the employee's wages and shall also be liable to fine of ten thousand rupees;
(b) which shall not be less than six months, in any other case and shall also be liable to fine of five thousand rupees:
PROVIDED that the Court may, for any adequate and special reasons to be recorded in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a lesser term;
(ii) where he commits an offence under any of the clauses (b) to (g) (both inclusive), with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to four thousand rupees, or with both.
COMMENTS
The principle is that where the discretion to apply the provision of a particular statute is left with the government or with one of the highest officers it will be presumed that the discretion vested in such authority will not be abused. The government or such authority is in a position to have all the relevant and necessary information in relation to each kind of establishment, the nature of defaults made by the employer and the necessity to decide whether the damages to be imposed should be exemplary or not. The object of ss. 85A and 85B of the ESI Act is to authorise the Regional Director of ESI Corporation to impose exemplary or punitive damages and thereby prevent the employees from making default.-- ESI Corporation v. M/s Venkatachalam Condiments 1995 (2) LLJ 1144. |